Ricardas Berankis vs Charles Broom Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performance indicates Broom has won 45.56% of points compared to Berankis' 47.47% over the last six months. Does this suggest Berankis has a slight edge? Yes, it does.
• Analyzing return game stats, Broom has a superior performance, winning 48.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Berankis manages 43.99%.
• For first-serve returns, Broom wins 25.14% and Berankis 23.96%, giving Broom a slight advantage in return games.
• In terms of saving breakpoints, Broom shows resilience with a 59.71% saving rate, compared to Berankis' 54.34%.
• Looking at overall performance, Berankis boasts a higher match win percentage over the last year at 56.86%, whereas Broom stands at 50%.
• Broom performs best on clay with a 67% win rate, but struggles more on indoor hard courts, at 57%. Conversely, Berankis excels on indoor hard courts with a 66% win rate but is less effective on clay at 52%.
• Broom's recent matches have mostly been at the Challenger/ITF level with a 43.33% win rate, while Berankis has a better record at the same level, winning 57.14% of matches.
• Direct matchups reveal Broom has defeated Berankis in their sole meeting, extending over three sets, with Broom securing the last match 6-1, 3-6, 6-2.
• In matches requiring a deciding set, Broom has a 38% win rate, while Berankis has a more promising 53% rate.
• When it comes to converting break points, Berankis is slightly more effective at 29.46%, compared to Broom's 26.25%.
• The average rank of Broom's opponents over the past year is 348.84, while Berankis has faced players averaging a rank of 252.8, indicating tough competition for Berankis.

Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming matchup between Broom and Berankis presents a closely contested scenario. While Berankis shows a slightly more consistent second serve performance, Broom counterbalances with stronger return stats, particularly against second serves, giving Broom an edge in breaking serve.

Under pressure, Broom demonstrates higher breakpoint saving efficiency, which could prove pivotal in tight moments. However, Berankis' ability on indoor hard courts and his more consistent performance in deciding sets present a significant challenge.

Despite Broom's superior direct head-to-head result, Berankis' experience against higher-ranked opponents and his overall better win percentage suggest he is slightly more favored.

Considering all factors, Berankis' broader competitive experience and refined performance on indoor hard courts render him the more likely winner in this upcoming tennis match against Broom.